Multi-Variable Risk & Coordination Matrix
Calibrate the variables driving consent friction on your project. The engine models the margin ConsentNZ recovers from that friction and positions your investment against it — the point where the fee stops behaving like a cost and starts paying an arbitrage dividend.
Baseline Project Value
Contract value under coordination. Sets the capital-at-risk weighting.
Consent Class
Risk profile of the consent pathway.
Council Friction & Compute Lane
Council Response Latency (CRL) is calibrated on 2024 NZ consent-performance data.
Coordination Load
Sub-trade interfaces drive RFI volume; seats scale the platform. Type a value or use the steppers.
5 interfaces baseline-modelled.
5 seats included.
Live Compliance Audit
Your real close-out profile — inspection issues in, CCC out. Every field is a tunable input.
Items carried out of an inspection needing assignment, resolution and evidence.
Statutory decision window is 20 working days. Only the excess is modelled as waste.
Carries 30% of compliance effort.
Carries 70% of compliance effort.
Modules & Capability
Toggle the capability set for this engagement.
Sealed until the value case is complete. Work the variables first — the investment is released on the presenter’s PIN.
Your investment is just 16% of the margin ConsentNZ recovers — below the 20% arbitrage line, so it stops behaving like a cost.
Indicative estimate for discussion only. Final pricing is confirmed after a scoping review.
Alpha Signal — where the margin comes from
How we stand behind $86,641
The recovered margin is not a headline figure — it is $120,335 of measurable close-out friction carried on this project, of which ConsentNZ removes 72%. Every exposure below sits after the consent is granted — unresolved inspection items, and the cost of clearing them once the building is finished. Modelled off your own inputs and sector benchmarks, never a percentage of contract value.
Internal PM and project-administration time noting, assigning, chasing and verifying every open inspection item — then answering the ones that resurface at CCC.
A finished asset held 44 days beyond the statutory CCC window — no lawful occupation, no revenue, retentions still held.
Engineering, fire and architectural hours rebuilding PS4 and design evidence for work monitored months earlier, long after the design team demobilised.
The cost of getting a trade back on site for a missing COC, PS3 or remedial item once they have priced and mobilised their next job.
Manually assembling and revision-checking the CCC set — COCs, producer statements, specified systems and as-builts — against a spreadsheet nobody fully trusts.
The Building Act 2004 gives a consent authority 20 working days to decide a CCC — everything past that is carried by you, and none of it is visible in a council portal, which records documents but never tells you which are still outstanding. Benchmarked against MBIE / Infometrics 2024 consent-performance data alongside sector holding-cost and consultant-fee norms. Conservative by design — it counts only exposure you can point to on a programme, and excludes opportunity cost, tender-capacity drag and reputational risk.